Add Your Heading Text Here

RPM Dashboard
Article

Why Start a Remote Patient Monitoring Program?

6 min read

Accessing a patient’s key health metrics remotely was something few healthcare providers could envision just a few decades ago. Today, this technology is readily available, with medical-grade health devices collecting and securely transmitting patient health data directly to physicians. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) programs offer many benefits for both patients and healthcare providers. Let’s explore how this technology can provide higher-quality care for patients while improving the profitability and sustainability of medical practices. We’ll also share a quick checklist you can use to decide if starting a remote patient monitoring program is the right choice for your patients and practice.

How a Remote Patient Monitoring Program Benefits Patients

Connected health devices can be used to monitor important health stats like blood pressure, heart rate, weight, sleep patterns, and more. Many patients get a lot out of participating in a remote patient monitoring program, including those who are managing chronic conditions (i.e. diabetes, hypertension), going through post-op recovery, or who live in a rural community or lack access to reliable transportation. Here are six specific ways RPM programs benefit patients.

Higher levels of patient engagement

One of the most important factors in improving patient health outcomes is engagement. Patients who are actively engaged in their own care are more likely to proactively engage with their healthcare providers and take charge of adjusting lifestyle factors that may be impacting their overall health. Remote patient monitoring technology puts actionable health information within easy reach, allowing patients and their care providers to view both current health metrics as well as trends over time.

Greater patient ownership of health outcomes

Remote patient monitoring connects patients with their own health metrics, allowing them to play a greater role in monitoring their health. Health data is displayed on an intuitive app that allows patients to track progress over time. Easy access to health data empowers patients to see how they can improve their health by adjusting lifestyle factors within their control.

Improved access to care

Patients may face many barriers when it comes to accessing medical care. Long commutes, work and childcare obligations, and a lack of reliable transportation are just a few of the roadblocks to overcome. And in rural communities, the closest provider may be hundreds of miles away. Remote patient monitoring technologies can be used as part of a holistic health program to offer more convenient care when and where patients need it.

Additional data to better inform treatment and early detection of health conditions

In-person visits provide just a snapshot in time of key health metrics like weight, heart rate, and blood pressure, and because these measurements are taken infrequently and in an abnormal environment, these measurements may paint an inaccurate picture of a patient’s health. Remote patient monitoring devices, in contrast, can collect readings much more frequently and can be set to alert providers when numbers indicate the presence of health issues that require urgent attention.

Reduced patient cost for monitoring chronic health conditions

Actively monitoring chronic health conditions can place a significant logistical and financial burden on patients who must make frequent visits to their healthcare providers, since these visits require time off of work as well as transportation-related expenses. Participating in a remote patient monitoring program enables physicians to collect key health data remotely, potentially reducing the number of required in-person visits.

Improved quality of care

Remote patient monitoring can result in significant improvements in the quality of care that patients receive. As noted above, it provides a valuable source of additional health data for providers, leading to more informed care. More frequent readings can enable earlier detection of critical health issues that require timely intervention, and can help physicians catch deteriorating conditions before they become problematic. They also provide a more holistic view of a patient’s health. Additionally, when patients have immediate access to their own health data they can be more motivated to make important lifestyle changes and take a more active role in their health outcomes.

How a Remote Patient Monitoring Program Benefits Primary Care Practices

Launching a remote patient monitoring program can unlock a host of benefits for primary medical practices. For providers seeking to improve the quality of patient care, boost revenue, and remain competitive, offering remote patient monitoring can help accomplish these goals.

Improved quality of care and patient oversight

Remote patient monitoring technologies measure health metrics with much greater frequency than in-office visits and allow healthcare professionals the ability to spot sudden changes that may require time-sensitive intervention. For example, with an RPM program, physicians can track weight as part of fluid management in patients with CHF.

Longitudinal care

Tracking patient health trends over time provides physicians and other healthcare professionals with valuable trend data that can be used to better manage patient care. For example, providers can more easily see how a chronic illness has progressed over time with a quick glance at a data chart.

Opportunities to expand the patient base

Now that remote patient monitoring technologies have matured, patients are starting to recognize the value and convenience of enrolling in one of these programs. The proliferation of wearable technology, such as the ScanWatch, has contributed. Establishing a robust remote patient monitoring program in your practice can attract new patients eager for the advantages it can provide.

Increased patient satisfaction

Remote patient monitoring programs result in happier patients. That’s no surprise. This technology enables patients to avoid unnecessary office visits, spend more time at work or home, and access their own health data with a few clicks of a mobile app. Research backs up this assertion. A 2021 study found that 91% of post-discharge COVID-19 patients monitored remotely using a pulse oximeter would recommend it to others.

Improved profitability for the practice

Remote patient monitoring can result in more efficient workflows, boosting the productivity of office staff and healthcare providers and enabling more patients access to care. RPM programs include several billable services reimbursable by Medicare and private insurers.

Checklist to Identify if an RPM Program Is Right for Your Practice

Although remote patient monitoring programs have a lot to offer, some patients and medical practices will benefit from them more than others. Here are a few important questions to ask when deciding if launching a remote patient monitoring program is the right move for your practice.

  • Would your current patients benefit from this technology?
  • Do a significant number of your patients have chronic health conditions such as hypertension, heart failure, COPD, or diabetes?
  • Do a significant number of your patients have health conditions requiring short-term monitoring such as those recovering from an acute condition like severe illness, injury, or a recent hospitalization?
  • Do some of your patients struggle to keep frequent in-person visits due to living in remote locations, lack of transportation, or schedule conflicts due to work or primary caregiver obligations?
  • Is your practice eager to expand billable services and take on additional patients?
  • Do you have adequate buy-in from office staff and physicians?

Withings Health Solutions Makes Starting an RPM Program Simple

Starting a remote patient monitoring program from scratch can feel like a daunting task. That’s why partnering with the right remote patient monitoring provider is so important. Every healthcare provider has been through the pain of technical integrations that take far more time and money than planned. Withings Health Solutions understands the challenges, and we know that everyone has different needs and processes. This is why we offer carefully designed data connection solutions for devices and RPM. During program setup, Withings Health Solutions handles all the onboarding and manages support, freeing your team to focus on patients, not managing tech.

With over a decade of industry experience, Withings Health Solutions offers medical-grade devices that feature intuitive designs that encourage high user adoption and retention rates, including a sleep tracking mat, remote blood pressure cuff, and smart scale. Our patient-facing Health Mate mobile app puts health data within easy reach, displaying it in a way that’s personalized and easy to understand. Our physician data dashboard offers intuitive, continuous access to all your patients’ critical health data in near-real time so you can provide better care to your patients. When you’re ready to launch your remote patient monitoring program, we’re ready to help.

Learn more about Withings Health Solutions for remote patient monitoring.

Don’t miss out,  subscribe to get the latest content updates.  

Related Content

WP_Query Object ( [query] => Array ( [post_type] => post [post_status] => publish [orderby] => date [order] => DESC [ignore_sticky_posts] => 1 [post__not_in] => Array ( [0] => 377 ) [cat] => 18 [posts_per_page] => 3 ) [query_vars] => Array ( [post_type] => post [post_status] => publish [orderby] => date [order] => DESC [ignore_sticky_posts] => 1 [post__not_in] => Array ( [0] => 377 ) [cat] => 18 [posts_per_page] => 3 [error] => [m] => [p] => 0 [post_parent] => [subpost] => [subpost_id] => [attachment] => [attachment_id] => 0 [name] => [pagename] => [page_id] => 0 [second] => [minute] => [hour] => [day] => 0 [monthnum] => 0 [year] => 0 [w] => 0 [category_name] => articles [tag] => [tag_id] => [author] => [author_name] => [feed] => [tb] => [paged] => 0 [meta_key] => [meta_value] => [preview] => [s] => [sentence] => [title] => [fields] => all [menu_order] => => [category__in] => Array ( ) [category__not_in] => Array ( ) [category__and] => Array ( ) [post__in] => Array ( ) [post_name__in] => Array ( ) [tag__in] => Array ( ) [tag__not_in] => Array ( ) [tag__and] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__in] => Array ( ) [tag_slug__and] => Array ( ) [post_parent__in] => Array ( ) [post_parent__not_in] => Array ( ) [author__in] => Array ( ) [author__not_in] => Array ( ) [search_columns] => Array ( ) [suppress_filters] => [cache_results] => 1 [update_post_term_cache] => 1 [update_menu_item_cache] => [lazy_load_term_meta] => 1 [update_post_meta_cache] => 1 [nopaging] => [comments_per_page] => 50 [no_found_rows] => ) [tax_query] => WP_Tax_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [taxonomy] => category [terms] => Array ( [0] => 18 ) [field] => term_id [operator] => IN [include_children] => 1 ) ) [relation] => AND [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( [0] => wp_term_relationships ) [queried_terms] => Array ( [category] => Array ( [terms] => Array ( [0] => 18 ) [field] => term_id ) ) [primary_table] => wp_posts [primary_id_column] => ID ) [meta_query] => WP_Meta_Query Object ( [queries] => Array ( ) [relation] => [meta_table] => [meta_id_column] => [primary_table] => [primary_id_column] => [table_aliases:protected] => Array ( ) [clauses:protected] => Array ( ) [has_or_relation:protected] => ) [date_query] => [request] => SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS wp_posts.ID FROM wp_posts LEFT JOIN wp_term_relationships ON (wp_posts.ID = wp_term_relationships.object_id) WHERE 1=1 AND wp_posts.ID NOT IN (377) AND ( wp_term_relationships.term_taxonomy_id IN (18) ) AND wp_posts.post_type = 'post' AND ((wp_posts.post_status = 'publish')) GROUP BY wp_posts.ID ORDER BY wp_posts.post_date DESC LIMIT 0, 3 [posts] => Array ( [0] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2100 [post_author] => 11 [post_date] => 2026-01-06 15:23:33 [post_date_gmt] => 2026-01-06 15:23:33 [post_content] =>

Introduction

Wearable ECG technology is increasingly used to support ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring, but questions remain about how these tools fit into patients’ daily lives.

 

A recent qualitative study conducted in the Netherlands explored this issue by comparing patient experiences using a smartwatch with single-lead ECG (1L-ECG) capability and a traditional Holter monitor over the course of one week.

 

The findings offer useful insights into the practical benefits and limitations of smartwatch-based ECG monitoring and what matters most to patients when rhythm monitoring moves beyond the clinic.

Study Overview

The study included 18 adults referred for ambulatory rhythm monitoring at a diagnostic center in the Netherlands, specifically through referrals from primary care to the cardiology outpatient clinic of the Dijklander Hospital in Hoorn. Participants were aged 32–85, with a median age of 66.

 

Each participant wore both:

  • A smartwatch with 1L-ECG capability (Withings ScanWatch), and
  • A conventional chest-worn Holter monitor

for seven days. Afterward, researchers conducted semi-structured interviews to understand their experiences with usability, comfort, confidence, and perceived clinical value.

 

Rather than focusing on diagnostic accuracy, the study centred on how patients experienced the monitoring process itself, an increasingly important consideration as wearable technologies become more common in routine care.

What Patients Reported

 

Comfort and Ease of Use

Participants consistently described the smartwatch as easier to wear and less intrusive than the Holter monitor. Wearing the watch felt familiar and fit naturally into daily routines, including sleep and regular activities. In contrast, the Holter monitor’s electrodes and wiring were more noticeable and, for some, uncomfortable over time.

 

Several participants noted skin irritation or inconvenience associated with adhesive electrodes, whereas the smartwatch was generally described as something they could wear without significant disruption to daily life.

 

“It’s a bit heavier than my own smartwatch. That takes a minute to get used to, but after that you don’t even notice it anymore. It’s waterproof, so you barely notice you’re wearing it — not even at night, since I always sleep with a watch on. I don’t feel the difference anymore. Other than that, it does what it’s supposed to do: tell the time. Which is pretty handy, too.”
P16, male patient, 48 years

 

Capturing Symptoms in Real Life

One of the key differences between the two approaches is how data are captured. The Holter monitor records continuously, while the smartwatch requires users to actively initiate an ECG recording.

 

Participants appreciated having control over recordings but also expressed uncertainty about when to trigger them, particularly when symptoms were brief, unexpected, or occurred during sleep or activities like driving. This highlights a trade-off between passive continuous monitoring and more user-driven approaches.

 

Automated ECG Results: Reassurance and Uncertainty

Some participants found algorithm-based ECG feedback reassuring, especially when results were reported as normal. Others described moments of uncertainty or anxiety when the smartwatch flagged potential abnormalities without immediate clinical context.

 

This finding underscores the importance of clear patient education and pathways for clinical follow-up when wearable ECG data are shared directly with users.

 

Integration With Clinical Care

Across interviews, participants emphasized that wearable ECG data felt most valuable when it could be reviewed by a healthcare professional. Many expressed a desire for smoother integration between smartwatch ECG recordings and clinical systems, as well as clearer guidance on how and when clinicians would review their data.

 

Patients generally viewed the smartwatch as a helpful complement to traditional monitoring, particularly when combined with clinician oversight, rather than a complete replacement.

Implications for Wearable ECG Monitoring

 

Overall, the study suggests that smartwatch-based 1L-ECG monitoring is acceptable to patients and may reduce some of the burden associated with traditional Holter monitoring, particularly in terms of comfort and day-to-day wearability.

 

At the same time, the findings point to areas where wearable ECG programs can improve:

  • Providing clearer guidance on when and how to record symptoms
  • Reducing uncertainty around automated ECG interpretations
  • Ensuring timely clinician review and communication

As devices like the Withings ScanWatch continue to be used in real-world clinical settings, patient experience will remain a critical factor alongside clinical validation.

Looking Forward

This study adds to a growing body of evidence showing that wearable ECG devices can support ambulatory rhythm monitoring in ways that align more closely with everyday life. Designing these tools and the care pathways around them with patient experience in mind will be key to realizing their full potential in clinical practice.

 

For more research-driven insights on connected health and remote monitoring, explore the latest updates on the Withings blog.

Interested in partnering with us?

Contact Us [post_title] => Patient Experiences With Smartwatch ECG Monitoring Compared to Traditional Holter Devices [post_excerpt] => A recent qualitative study conducted in the Netherlands compares patient experiences using a smartwatch with single-lead ECG (1L-ECG) capability and a traditional Holter monitor over the course of one week. [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => patient-experiences-with-smartwatch-ecg-monitoring-compared-to-traditional-holter-devices [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2026-01-06 15:51:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2026-01-06 15:51:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://withingshealthsolutions.com/?p=2100 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [1] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2088 [post_author] => 11 [post_date] => 2025-12-15 15:48:18 [post_date_gmt] => 2025-12-15 15:48:18 [post_content] =>

The World Health Organization recently released its first global guideline on the use of GLP-1–based therapies for obesity, a milestone that signals a major shift in how health systems worldwide should approach long-term obesity care.

 

For obesity programs, digital-health organizations, and chronic-care providers, the message is clear: GLP-1s can be valuable tools, but only when embedded within a structured framework of behavioral support, lifestyle intervention, and ongoing monitoring.

Here’s a guide to what programs need to understand and how to prepare.

 

1. WHO Defines Obesity as a Chronic, Relapsing Disease, Not a Short-Term Problem or Fix

The guideline reinforces a position many clinicians already share: obesity requires ongoing management similar to other chronic diseases. This means obesity programs must prioritize continuity, long-term engagement, and structured monitoring, not episodic care. Many times patients see weight loss as a goal that they reach and that concludes their obesity care journey. The WHO emphasizes the ongoing nature of obesity as a disease, and obesity care as a necessity.

 

2. GLP-1s Are Recommended Conditionally and Only as Part of Comprehensive Care

WHO does not recommend medication alone. The guideline emphasizes:
GLP-1 therapies should be considered as one component of a broader care plan.

Treatment decisions should reflect patient context, preferences, and access. Programs must integrate behavioral interventions and lifestyle support alongside medication. For organizations delivering obesity care, this signals a need to strengthen or formalize their behavioral-support models, including: coaching, education, medical nutrition therapy (MNT), activity support, and digital engagement.

 

3. Behavioral Support Is Essential-Not Optional

The guideline places intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) at the center of obesity care. Programs should ensure they can offer:

  • Structured lifestyle guidance
  • Goal setting and personalized plans
  • Coaching or counseling pathways
  • Tools for sustained behavior change
  • Ongoing check-ins and accountability
  • Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) when needed

This isn’t merely additive, it is foundational to responsible GLP-1 prescribing and to long-term patient outcomes.

 

4. Monitoring Frameworks Must Become Core Infrastructure

One of the most operationally important implications for obesity programs is WHO’s emphasis on continuous monitoring and follow-up. Because obesity is chronic and GLP-1 outcomes evolve over time, programs need systems that can:

  • Track weight, body composition, and metabolic markers
  • Detect early signs of weight regain or treatment non-response
  • Support long-term engagement after dose changes or discontinuation
  • Ensure care teams can intervene proactively and remain the decision makers

This is where digital health infrastructure becomes essential. Connected devices, remote monitoring, and automated data flows make it possible to support thousands of patients consistently without adding extensive labor burden to clinical teams.

 

5. What Obesity Programs Should Do Next

To align with WHO’s guidance and strengthen patient outcomes, programs can begin by:

  • Evaluating their behavioral-support offering - ensuring it is structured, consistent, and accessible.
  • Implementing device-based monitoring- enabling ongoing, objective tracking of patient progress without the barriers of in-office care.
  • Ensuring continuity models beyond initial weight loss - including maintenance and relapse-prevention.
  • Building customizable data workflows that let care teams intervene early, efficiently, and at scale, while keeping the decision-making in the hands of the clinician.
  • Partnering with technology providers already equipped to deliver these components reliably.

The Bottom Line for Obesity Programs

The new WHO guideline is not simply a statement on medications. It is a blueprint for comprehensive, long-term obesity care. Programs that combine medication, behavioral support, and robust monitoring will be best positioned to deliver durable outcomes, meet patient expectations, reduce clinical burden, and scale responsibly.


Withings Health Solutions stands ready to support that evolution with the technology, partnerships, and evidence-aligned frameworks that make multimodal obesity care possible.

Interested in partnering with us?

Contact Us [post_title] => What Obesity Care Programs Need to Know About WHO’s New GLP-1 Guidelines [post_excerpt] => Learn what obesity care programs need to know about the new World Health Organization GLP-1 guidelines for obesity care. [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => what-obesity-care-programs-need-to-know-about-whos-new-obesity-treatment-guidelines [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2026-01-06 14:26:20 [post_modified_gmt] => 2026-01-06 14:26:20 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://withingshealthsolutions.com/?p=2088 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [2] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2083 [post_author] => 11 [post_date] => 2025-12-02 20:22:02 [post_date_gmt] => 2025-12-02 20:22:02 [post_content] =>

Chronic Kidney Disease stage 5 on dialysis (CKD5D) presents one of the most complex and high-risk scenarios in modern medicine. Among the many challenges faced by these patients, cardiovascular disease (CVD) stands out as the leading cause of mortality—a stark reminder of the systemic stress that accompanies kidney failure and dialysis.

 

But what if technology could help bridge the gap between dialysis sessions, offering clinicians a window into the patient's health in real-time? An article in Frontiers in Nephrology explores exactly that, highlighting the transformative potential of digital health technologies to monitor and manage CKD5D patients beyond the clinic.

The Hidden Risks Between Dialysis Sessions

For CKD5D patients, the risks of CVD are amplified by both traditional and disease-specific factors:

  • Traditional risks like hypertension, diabetes, and obesity.
  • CKD-specific risks such as inflammation, fluid overload, protein-energy wasting and vascular calcification.
  • The dialysis process itself, which induces rapid fluid shifts, blood pressure fluctuations, and metabolic imbalances.

Current clinical care models often focus on in-center dialysis data, leaving a crucial blind spot during the interdialytic period—a time when many adverse events begin to develop unnoticed.

A New Monitoring Paradigm: The Withings Toolkit

The article introduces a compelling case for home-based, connected health technologies—specifically, the Withings toolkit. This suite of medical-grade, consumer-friendly devices allows CKD patients to monitor key health indicators in the comfort of their homes:

  • Weight, body composition and ECG monitoring with the BodyScan smart scale.
  • Blood pressure, heart rate and survey responses for added context via BPM Pro 2.
  • Sleep quality and breathing event metrics using the Sleep Rx.

All data is seamlessly uploaded to the Withings Remote Patient Monitoring platform, providing healthcare providers and researchers with real-time, longitudinal insights into a patient’s well-being.

Why This Matters: Real-World Clinical Benefits

 

1. Early Detection of Complications
Weight gain could signal fluid retention, but muscle loss could indicate protein-energy wasting. A sudden spike in blood pressure or irregular heartbeat might indicate arrhythmias or volume overload. Poor sleep patterns could reflect apnea or restless leg syndrome—conditions with known ties to CKD.

 

2. Personalized, Data-Driven Care
These devices enable a dynamic view of health trends, allowing clinicians to tailor treatments proactively rather than reactively. Medication adjustments, fluid restrictions, or further diagnostics can be made with greater confidence.

 

3. Patient Empowerment

When patients can see and understand their own data, they become more engaged in their care. This promotes better self-management, increased treatment adherence, and a stronger sense of control over their condition.

 

4. Systemic Healthcare Advantages
Remote monitoring can reduce emergency visits and hospitalizations, easing the burden on overtaxed healthcare systems and offering a cost-effective alternative to frequent in-person evaluations.

The Future: Digital Tools as Standard of Care?

While still in its early stages, this integration of digital health into CKD care reflects a broader movement toward remote, preventative, and personalized medicine. The Withings case study serves as a promising example of how everyday technology can be adapted to serve complex clinical needs.

 

However, as the authors note, more clinical trials are needed to validate these tools in nephrology settings, establish protocols for data use, and ensure equitable access across diverse patient populations.

Final Thoughts

As we face growing rates of kidney disease and limited nephrology resources, connected health technologies offer a lifeline—not just to patients, but to an entire care infrastructure in need of modernization.


The Withings toolkit is more than a gadget suite; it's a glimpse into the future of chronic disease management, where data flows continuously, care is adaptive, and patients are active participants in their own health journey.

Reference:
Article: Frontiers in Nephrology, 2023 - DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2023.1148565

Interested in partnering with us?

Contact Us [post_title] => Revolutionizing Chronic Kidney Disease Management with Digital Health Tools: The Withings Case Study [post_excerpt] => Researchers from Imperial College London explored how continuous, contactless sleep monitoring using the Withings Sleep Analyzer can be used to detect acute conditions, focusing particularly on urinary tract infections (UTIs) before patients even recognize symptoms. [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => revolutionizing-chronic-kidney-disease-management-with-digital-health-tools-the-withings-case-study [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2025-12-02 20:22:24 [post_modified_gmt] => 2025-12-02 20:22:24 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://withingshealthsolutions.com/?p=2083 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) ) [post_count] => 3 [current_post] => -1 [before_loop] => 1 [in_the_loop] => [post] => WP_Post Object ( [ID] => 2100 [post_author] => 11 [post_date] => 2026-01-06 15:23:33 [post_date_gmt] => 2026-01-06 15:23:33 [post_content] =>

Introduction

Wearable ECG technology is increasingly used to support ambulatory cardiac rhythm monitoring, but questions remain about how these tools fit into patients’ daily lives.

 

A recent qualitative study conducted in the Netherlands explored this issue by comparing patient experiences using a smartwatch with single-lead ECG (1L-ECG) capability and a traditional Holter monitor over the course of one week.

 

The findings offer useful insights into the practical benefits and limitations of smartwatch-based ECG monitoring and what matters most to patients when rhythm monitoring moves beyond the clinic.

Study Overview

The study included 18 adults referred for ambulatory rhythm monitoring at a diagnostic center in the Netherlands, specifically through referrals from primary care to the cardiology outpatient clinic of the Dijklander Hospital in Hoorn. Participants were aged 32–85, with a median age of 66.

 

Each participant wore both:

  • A smartwatch with 1L-ECG capability (Withings ScanWatch), and
  • A conventional chest-worn Holter monitor

for seven days. Afterward, researchers conducted semi-structured interviews to understand their experiences with usability, comfort, confidence, and perceived clinical value.

 

Rather than focusing on diagnostic accuracy, the study centred on how patients experienced the monitoring process itself, an increasingly important consideration as wearable technologies become more common in routine care.

What Patients Reported

 

Comfort and Ease of Use

Participants consistently described the smartwatch as easier to wear and less intrusive than the Holter monitor. Wearing the watch felt familiar and fit naturally into daily routines, including sleep and regular activities. In contrast, the Holter monitor’s electrodes and wiring were more noticeable and, for some, uncomfortable over time.

 

Several participants noted skin irritation or inconvenience associated with adhesive electrodes, whereas the smartwatch was generally described as something they could wear without significant disruption to daily life.

 

“It’s a bit heavier than my own smartwatch. That takes a minute to get used to, but after that you don’t even notice it anymore. It’s waterproof, so you barely notice you’re wearing it — not even at night, since I always sleep with a watch on. I don’t feel the difference anymore. Other than that, it does what it’s supposed to do: tell the time. Which is pretty handy, too.”
P16, male patient, 48 years

 

Capturing Symptoms in Real Life

One of the key differences between the two approaches is how data are captured. The Holter monitor records continuously, while the smartwatch requires users to actively initiate an ECG recording.

 

Participants appreciated having control over recordings but also expressed uncertainty about when to trigger them, particularly when symptoms were brief, unexpected, or occurred during sleep or activities like driving. This highlights a trade-off between passive continuous monitoring and more user-driven approaches.

 

Automated ECG Results: Reassurance and Uncertainty

Some participants found algorithm-based ECG feedback reassuring, especially when results were reported as normal. Others described moments of uncertainty or anxiety when the smartwatch flagged potential abnormalities without immediate clinical context.

 

This finding underscores the importance of clear patient education and pathways for clinical follow-up when wearable ECG data are shared directly with users.

 

Integration With Clinical Care

Across interviews, participants emphasized that wearable ECG data felt most valuable when it could be reviewed by a healthcare professional. Many expressed a desire for smoother integration between smartwatch ECG recordings and clinical systems, as well as clearer guidance on how and when clinicians would review their data.

 

Patients generally viewed the smartwatch as a helpful complement to traditional monitoring, particularly when combined with clinician oversight, rather than a complete replacement.

Implications for Wearable ECG Monitoring

 

Overall, the study suggests that smartwatch-based 1L-ECG monitoring is acceptable to patients and may reduce some of the burden associated with traditional Holter monitoring, particularly in terms of comfort and day-to-day wearability.

 

At the same time, the findings point to areas where wearable ECG programs can improve:

  • Providing clearer guidance on when and how to record symptoms
  • Reducing uncertainty around automated ECG interpretations
  • Ensuring timely clinician review and communication

As devices like the Withings ScanWatch continue to be used in real-world clinical settings, patient experience will remain a critical factor alongside clinical validation.

Looking Forward

This study adds to a growing body of evidence showing that wearable ECG devices can support ambulatory rhythm monitoring in ways that align more closely with everyday life. Designing these tools and the care pathways around them with patient experience in mind will be key to realizing their full potential in clinical practice.

 

For more research-driven insights on connected health and remote monitoring, explore the latest updates on the Withings blog.

Interested in partnering with us?

Contact Us [post_title] => Patient Experiences With Smartwatch ECG Monitoring Compared to Traditional Holter Devices [post_excerpt] => A recent qualitative study conducted in the Netherlands compares patient experiences using a smartwatch with single-lead ECG (1L-ECG) capability and a traditional Holter monitor over the course of one week. [post_status] => publish [comment_status] => closed [ping_status] => closed [post_password] => [post_name] => patient-experiences-with-smartwatch-ecg-monitoring-compared-to-traditional-holter-devices [to_ping] => [pinged] => [post_modified] => 2026-01-06 15:51:03 [post_modified_gmt] => 2026-01-06 15:51:03 [post_content_filtered] => [post_parent] => 0 [guid] => https://withingshealthsolutions.com/?p=2100 [menu_order] => 0 [post_type] => post [post_mime_type] => [comment_count] => 0 [filter] => raw ) [comment_count] => 0 [current_comment] => -1 [found_posts] => 54 [max_num_pages] => 18 [max_num_comment_pages] => 0 [is_single] => [is_preview] => [is_page] => [is_archive] => 1 [is_date] => [is_year] => [is_month] => [is_day] => [is_time] => [is_author] => [is_category] => 1 [is_tag] => [is_tax] => [is_search] => [is_feed] => [is_comment_feed] => [is_trackback] => [is_home] => [is_privacy_policy] => [is_404] => [is_embed] => [is_paged] => [is_admin] => [is_attachment] => [is_singular] => [is_robots] => [is_favicon] => [is_posts_page] => [is_post_type_archive] => [query_vars_hash:WP_Query:private] => 105fc667f4d08f564af148470782ed1f [query_vars_changed:WP_Query:private] => [thumbnails_cached] => [allow_query_attachment_by_filename:protected] => [stopwords:WP_Query:private] => [compat_fields:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => query_vars_hash [1] => query_vars_changed ) [compat_methods:WP_Query:private] => Array ( [0] => init_query_flags [1] => parse_tax_query ) [query_cache_key:WP_Query:private] => wp_query:968992cc63f906fff8326c064e551af5 )
Article

Patient Experiences With Smartwatch ECG Monitoring Compared to Traditional Holter Devices

Read More
Article

What Obesity Care Programs Need to Know About WHO’s New GLP-1 Guidelines

Read More
Article

Revolutionizing Chronic Kidney Disease Management with Digital Health Tools: The Withings Case Study

Read More

Withings On-The-Go

Our patient-centric care solution utilizes portable Withings cellular devices that are not tied to a single patient. Instead, care teams can use one device to collect and transmit data for an unlimited number of individuals. The integrated cellular connectivity automatically directs the data into the correct patient’s medical record, simplifying data collection and improving care delivery regardless of the setting.
Interested? Contact Us